Wibbly-wobbly, lovey-dovey
May. 31st, 2011 01:15 pm[Spoilers below for Doctor Who Season 5.]
Just finished watching Season 5 of the new Who, and while I'm enjoying the new folks a great deal, I've been pissed at the writing more than once. Is it just me, or has there been a kind of sea change in the rules of causality? I mean, I know, the science is always super-spotty, but the way Tennant carried it off (wibbly wobbly, timey-wimey) was always funny and, to me at least, believable - or at least I was able to suspend my disbelief. Now it seems like more often than not, the thing that saves the day is the equivalent of people clapping their hands and saying "I believe in fairies!"
Is it just me? I mean, I'm a person who's really into the power of love and memory and belief, but it's not what I expect - or what I've seen - from this show so far, and it's annoying me. Beating Dalek technology with memories of an old girlfriend? Making a time-traveling ship explode with the power of schmoop? Making a Rory-bot real by being really insistent about your love for him? Resurrecting the Doctor from a reboot of the entire universe using Amy's memories?
It seems sappy at best, horribly lazy at worst. Your thoughts?
Just finished watching Season 5 of the new Who, and while I'm enjoying the new folks a great deal, I've been pissed at the writing more than once. Is it just me, or has there been a kind of sea change in the rules of causality? I mean, I know, the science is always super-spotty, but the way Tennant carried it off (wibbly wobbly, timey-wimey) was always funny and, to me at least, believable - or at least I was able to suspend my disbelief. Now it seems like more often than not, the thing that saves the day is the equivalent of people clapping their hands and saying "I believe in fairies!"
Is it just me? I mean, I'm a person who's really into the power of love and memory and belief, but it's not what I expect - or what I've seen - from this show so far, and it's annoying me. Beating Dalek technology with memories of an old girlfriend? Making a time-traveling ship explode with the power of schmoop? Making a Rory-bot real by being really insistent about your love for him? Resurrecting the Doctor from a reboot of the entire universe using Amy's memories?
It seems sappy at best, horribly lazy at worst. Your thoughts?
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 05:37 pm (UTC)But yes, I do kinda miss the very old days when the Doctor's solution often was to blow something up.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 05:44 pm (UTC)(Don't forget, he had to use it on his own people, and it STILL didn't get rid of the Daleks.)
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 05:49 pm (UTC)(Not that she's not a special redhead. Woof.)
But seriously, I'm just finding it all hard to buy.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 05:56 pm (UTC)Not that she's not a special redhead. Woof.
Oh my, yes. I especially like the bits when she flirts with herself.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 06:04 pm (UTC)Again, it might have been one of those things where I went, "seriously?" a little bit, but then promptly forgot about it because all of the other elements - not least of them Tennant's always-phenomenal acting - were so strong. These days, it often feels more like a cop-out, and is unsatisfying. Not to mention incomprehensible; I often find myself going, "Wait, what saved the day? What just happened, and why did it work?"
no subject
Date: 2011-06-02 12:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 05:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 05:52 pm (UTC)Seriously, I think of it as Smith, Season 2.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 06:33 pm (UTC)Right now it's a lot of "I'm the Doctor" and waving the sonic screwdriver at everything. McCoy's incarnation talked a Dalek into self-destructing, played a long chess game with evil, made funky quips "absence makes the nose grow longer", and was generally both wacky (the spoons) and manipulative (the whole last season). Tom Baker's Doctor suggested a psychological force field in /The Armageddon Factor/, and was generally a lot more cerebral and moody (both as the Doctor and as himself) much to Matthew Waterhouse's regret, see Blue Box Boy).
no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 07:44 pm (UTC)I think one of the big differences in terms of the tone of the show has to do with Stephen Moffat's having taken over from Russel T. Davies. Moffat will often go for a certain flair or emotion in his writing that can defy sense or even good storytelling. (Have you seen the "Christmas Carol" episode yet? That ending had me shouting at the screen.) I'm coming to like Smith's Doctor; I think he's fitting right in with several of his previous incarnations. But Moffat, I think, needs Davies' skillful editing if he's wever going to create such gems again as "Blink" or "Silence in the Library".
no subject
Date: 2011-06-02 12:55 am (UTC)I do like Matt Smith as well, in spite of myself.
My theory of Timelord Time
Date: 2011-05-31 11:11 pm (UTC)I dislike the way that during the Tennant era the Sonic Screwdriver changed from unique lockpick to All-Purpose-Magic-Wand. The first time he waved it over a computer console, glanced at the hilt and then knew everything the scanners had been picking up made me go ACK!
They talk about the Doctor being brilliant but they don't show it nearly as often as I would like.
The best way I can rationalize the rewrite of The Laws of Time (and I do love me a good rationalization) is this:
In the beginning, time travellers mucked around and changed history. Often, they wiped themselves out accidentally.
The Timelords were smart enough to make an ironclad rule: Thou Shalt Not Screw Around With The History of Gallifrey. That means timelords can't even visit home without staying in synch with everybody else.
Other attempts to change history in other parts of the universe Ended Badly. So the rule was made general.
Eventually, everybody forgot that it was even possible, because it Just Wasn't Done.
Then the Daleks got time travel tech and set out to violate Rule 1. Then a tangled battle to eradicate each others' great-great-grand-eradicators ensued: the Time War.
The Doctor said, "screw this, you guys are getting as bad as the Daleks, a pox on both your houses," and shoved them all into a bottle universe that they occasionally try to break out of.
Then he spent a long while being moody before showing up as Eccelston for the series reboot.
Gradually, in the next few seasons, he starts to fight his ingrained mental block that Bad Things Always Happen when you screw around with rewriting history. Eventually he realizes
that, "I'm the last Timelord. I can do whatever I want!" and
the process finishes when the cracks in time show him that,
"hey, the Universe is getting screwed with whether I participate
or not, I might as well tilt things my way."
Re: My theory of Timelord Time
Date: 2011-06-02 12:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-31 11:23 pm (UTC)That said, Smith definitely combines the cerebral sensibility of oldWho with the action scenes of nuWho. He gives excellent ramble and he tries not to give the pat 'timey-wimey' type answer as a rule. Admittedly they have done pretty well with character development on the whole. Still, in some ways I'd rather watch oldWho for somewhat coherent plots.