Nov. 11th, 2005

kitchen_kink: (Default)
I just did the 8 Hunks of Hannukah thing, and it was an interesting exercise if for nothing else than figuring out what I needed to see in order to think a guy was attractive without being able to talk to him.

Things I apparently like:
Pretty boys - I succumbed most times, whether they seemed smart and interesting or not
Bearish guys who look interesting
Guys who seem really zany
Guys who poke fun at the process of having sexy pics taken of them
Bald guys with goatees
Guys with babies
Guys shown doing something that's important to them
[livejournal.com profile] regyt. Good god, woman.

Things I can do without:
Guys who look mean
Guys who are pretty but don't seem to have anything else going on (except [livejournal.com profile] dirtstar...I mean come ON.)
Guys who look like gangstas
Guys who look like frat boys
Guys whose face I can't see in the picture
Guys who are dogs or cats
Guys who go overboard with the SCA-type shots
Guys who really are just a bit too burly
Guys who have only one picture in which they look very effeminate without actually being pretty
Guys who put too much emphasis on showing their bare bits

And some of them...I can't even put my finger on. It was just like, he struck me, or he didn't.

I didn't bother with the 12 Babes of Christmas thing, even though I got nominated for it. But hey, reverse exploitation? Let's GO! But seriously...is this just about physical looks? Other folks who've voted - what's your criteria been? More and more I find it hard to find someone attractive unless I can talk to them. Sometimes, though, a picture can capture something interesting about a person. For the most part, that was my main criterion. Except for the pretty boys. It might be time to admit I have a problem.

Profile

kitchen_kink: (Default)
Oh look, it's Dietrich

2025

S M T W T F S

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 08:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios