Basically. There's infinitely more nuance to it than that, of course, and reasons for the various time limits and historical evolution of how and why defendants can be held and all that, but I doubt that really matters for your story. You get the basic idea.
Guy gets arrested. Must have probable cause to make an arrest. He gets thrown in a holding pen - not even in jail yet, really. He gets his initial appearance within 48 hours. All you need for an initial appearance is a probable cause document, like a complaint. You don't need an information or an indictment yet, which are triable accusatory documents. The initial appearance is just a probable cause hearing, to determine whether he can be held further. Next step is to get a triable accusatory document. One way to do that is to go before a grand jury (which has more than 12 people, has no defense, and just determines whether the case even deserves to be tried). It's basically - in states west of Mississippi, a person can be tried on the basis of an information, which is submitted by the prosecutor without bothering to go through a grand jury. In states east of the Mississippi, you generally need an indictment from a grand jury. NY is particularly stringent about the grand jury. (The 12 person jury you're used to is called a petit jury, pronounced 'peh-tit'.) Anyway, that indictment is what Rule 61 demands you get within 30 days.
You actually only need a complaint, not an information or an indictment, to have an arraignment. Odd as that is, in my opinion.
And yes, trial can pretty much take any amount of time after that, though you can run into a 6th Amendment speedy trial violation and get the case dismissed if it takes too long, though what that means is a more intricate issue than I'll bother to address here and now.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-27 01:54 pm (UTC)Guy gets arrested. Must have probable cause to make an arrest. He gets thrown in a holding pen - not even in jail yet, really. He gets his initial appearance within 48 hours. All you need for an initial appearance is a probable cause document, like a complaint. You don't need an information or an indictment yet, which are triable accusatory documents. The initial appearance is just a probable cause hearing, to determine whether he can be held further. Next step is to get a triable accusatory document. One way to do that is to go before a grand jury (which has more than 12 people, has no defense, and just determines whether the case even deserves to be tried). It's basically - in states west of Mississippi, a person can be tried on the basis of an information, which is submitted by the prosecutor without bothering to go through a grand jury. In states east of the Mississippi, you generally need an indictment from a grand jury. NY is particularly stringent about the grand jury. (The 12 person jury you're used to is called a petit jury, pronounced 'peh-tit'.) Anyway, that indictment is what Rule 61 demands you get within 30 days.
You actually only need a complaint, not an information or an indictment, to have an arraignment. Odd as that is, in my opinion.
And yes, trial can pretty much take any amount of time after that, though you can run into a 6th Amendment speedy trial violation and get the case dismissed if it takes too long, though what that means is a more intricate issue than I'll bother to address here and now.